|
|
|
|||
| Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | | ||||
COMMENTS AND REPLIES
2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 478002 (4pp) doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/42/47/478002
![]()
|
||||
Abstract. We discuss the nature of the two-stage percolation transition on the enhanced binary tree in order to explain the disagreement in the estimation of the second transition probability between the one in our recent paper (2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 145001) and the other in the comment to it from Baek et al (2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 478001). We point out some reasons that the finite size scaling analysis used by them is not proper for the enhanced tree due to its nonamenable nature, which is verified by some numerical results.
PACS numbers: 64.60.ah, 68.35.Rh, 64.60.al, 89.75.Hc
Print publication: Issue 47 (27 November 2009)| Post to CiteUlike | | Post to Connotea | | Post to Bibsonomy |
|
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | Recommend this journal EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft. Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009. Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited. Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer |
|
| |