journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Environmental Research Letters
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

Understanding the Canadian oil sands industry's greenhouse gas emissions

Alex D Charpentier et al 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 014005 (11pp)   doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014005  Help

   PDF (416 KB) | HTML | Supplementary data | References | Articles citing this article

Alex D Charpentier1, Joule A Bergerson2 and Heather L MacLean1,3,4
1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A4, Canada
2 ISEEE Energy and Environmental Systems Group, Center for Environmental Engineering Research and Education, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
3 School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Toronto, 14 Queen's Park Crescent West, Toronto, ON, M5S 3K9, Canada
4 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
E-mail: alex.charpentier@utoronto.ca, jbergers@ucalgary.ca and hmaclean@ecf.utoronto.ca

Abstract. The magnitude of Canada's oil sands reserves, their rapidly expanding and energy intensive production, combined with existing and upcoming greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions regulations motivate an evaluation of oil sands-derived fuel production from a life cycle perspective. Thirteen studies of GHG emissions associated with oil sands operations are reviewed. The production of synthetic crude oil (SCO) through surface mining and upgrading (SM&Up) or in situ and upgrading (IS&Up) processes is reported to result in emissions ranging from 62 to 164 and 99 to 176 kgCO2eq/bbl SCO, respectively (or 9.2–26.5 and 16.2–28.7 gCO2eq MJ−1 SCO, respectively), compared to 27–58 kgCO2eq/bbl (4.5–9.6 gCO2eq MJ−1) of crude for conventional oil production. The difference in emissions intensity between SCO and conventional crude production is primarily due to higher energy requirements for extracting bitumen and upgrading it into SCO. On a 'well-to-wheel' basis, GHG emissions associated with producing reformulated gasoline from oil sands with current SM&Up, IS&Up, and in situ (without upgrading) technologies are 260–320, 320–350, and 270–340 gCO2eq km−1, respectively, compared to 250–280 gCO2eq km−1 for production from conventional oil. Some variation between studies is expected due to differences in methods, technologies studied, and operating choices. However, the magnitude of the differences presented suggests that a consensus on the characterization of life cycle emissions of the oil sands industry has yet to be reached in the public literature. Recommendations are given for future studies for informing industry and government decision making.

For more information on this article, see environmentalresearchweb.org

Received 2 October 2008, accepted for publication 30 December 2008
Published 20 January 2009

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

This Month's Paperseprintweb.org - Your address for E prints
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2010.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer
 
ERL's birthday