American Astronomical Society
Quick Search:Help  
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
IOP Publishing | AAS Homepage | ApJ Homepage | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

HIGH-RESOLUTION X-RAY IMAGING OF SUPERNOVA REMNANT 1987A

C.-Y. Ng et al 2009 ApJ 706 L100-L105   doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/L100  Help

   PDF (890 KB) | HTML | References

C.-Y. Ng1, B. M. Gaensler1, S. S. Murray2, P. O. Slane2, S. Park3, L. Staveley-Smith4, R. N. Manchester5 and D. N. Burrows3
1 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
2 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
3 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
4 International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, School of Physics, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
5 Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, Marsfield, NSW 1710, Australia
E-mail: ncy@physics.usyd.edu.au

ABSTRACT. We report observations of the remnant of supernova 1987A with the High Resolution Camera (HRC) on board the Chandra X-ray Observatory. A direct image from the HRC resolves the annular structure of the X-ray remnant, confirming the morphology previously inferred by deconvolution of lower resolution data from the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer. Detailed spatial modeling shows that a thin ring plus a thin shell gives statistically the best description of the overall remnant structure, and suggests an outer radius of 0farcs96 ± 0farcs05 ± 0farcs03 for the X-ray-emitting region, with the two uncertainties corresponding to the statistical and systematic errors, respectively. This is very similar to the radius determined by a similar modeling technique for the radio shell at a comparable epoch, in contrast to previous claims that the remnant is 10%-15% smaller at X-rays than in the radio band. The HRC observations put a flux limit of 0.010 counts s–1 (99% confidence level, 0.08-10 keV range) on any compact source at the remnant center. Assuming the same foreground neutral hydrogen column density as toward the remnant, this allows us to rule out an unobscured neutron star with surface temperature T > 2.5 MK observed at infinity, a bright pulsar wind nebula or a magnetar.

Key words: circumstellar matter; shock waves; stars: neutron; supernova remnants; supernovae: individual (SN, 1987A); X-rays: general

Print publication: Issue 1 (2009 November 20)
Received 2009 September 16, accepted for publication 2009 October 15
Published 2009 November 2

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

IOP Journal Archiveeprintweb.org - Your address for E prints
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009 - electronic design and all rights in the EJs software.
© The American Astronomical Society ("AAS") - the names of any journals published by AAS and the content of all such journals.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection.