Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft The Institute of Physics Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft | Institute of Physics Quick Search:Help  
New Journal of Physics
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
IOP Journals Home | IOP Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |
< Previous article | Next article * | This volume ^^ | This month ^ | Content finder *

A double-slit 'which-way' experiment on the complementarity–uncertainty debate

R Mir et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 287   doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/287  Help

   PDF (843 KB) | HTML | References | Articles citing this article

R Mir1, J S Lundeen1, M W Mitchell2, A M Steinberg1, J L Garretson3 and H M Wiseman3
1 Centre for Quantum Information and Quantum Control and Institute for Optical Sciences, Department of Physics, 60 St George Street, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, M5S 1A7, Canada
2 ICFO—Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, Jordi Girona 29, Nexus II,08034 Barcelona, Spain
3 Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Brisbane,Queensland 4111, Australia
E-mail: h.wiseman@griffith.edu.au

Abstract. A which-way measurement in Young's double-slit will destroy the interference pattern. Bohr claimed this complementarity between wave- and particle-behaviour is enforced by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: distinguishing two positions at a distance s apart transfers a random momentum q ~ planck/s to the particle. This claim has been subject to debate: Scully et al (1991 Nature 351 111) asserted that in some situations interference can be destroyed with no momentum transfer, while Storey et al (1994 Nature 367 626) asserted that Bohr's stance is always valid. We address this issue using the experimental technique of weak measurement. We measure a distribution for q that spreads well beyond [−planck/s, planck/s], but nevertheless has a variance consistent with zero. This weak-valued momentum-transfer distribution Pwv(q) thus reflects both sides of the debate.

Received 28 June 2007
Published 28 August 2007

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

 
< Previous article | Next article * | This volume ^^ | This month ^
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © 1998-2010 Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft & Institute of Physics