journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physiological Measurement
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

TOPICAL REVIEW

Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques

Stephen J Preece et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 R1-R33   doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/4/R01  Help

   PDF (394 KB) | References

Stephen J Preece1,4, John Y Goulermas2, Laurence P J Kenney1, Dave Howard1, Kenneth Meijer3 and Robin Crompton2
1 Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK
2 University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3 University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
4 Address for correspondence: Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, Room PO 25a, Blatchford Building, Fredrick Road Campus, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, UK
E-mail: s.preece@salford.ac.uk, l.p.j.kenney@salford.ac.uk, d.howard@salford.ac.uk, j.y.goulermas@liverpool.ac.uk, rhcromp@liverpool.ac.uk and Kenneth.Meijer@BW.unimaas.nl

Abstract. With the advent of miniaturized sensing technology, which can be body-worn, it is now possible to collect and store data on different aspects of human movement under the conditions of free living. This technology has the potential to be used in automated activity profiling systems which produce a continuous record of activity patterns over extended periods of time. Such activity profiling systems are dependent on classification algorithms which can effectively interpret body-worn sensor data and identify different activities. This article reviews the different techniques which have been used to classify normal activities and/or identify falls from body-worn sensor data. The review is structured according to the different analytical techniques and illustrates the variety of approaches which have previously been applied in this field. Although significant progress has been made in this important area, there is still significant scope for further work, particularly in the application of advanced classification techniques to problems involving many different activities.

Keywords: activity monitoring, classification, fall detection, machine learning

Print publication: Issue 4 (April 2009)
Received 28 June 2008, accepted for publication 13 February 2009
Published 2 April 2009

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

IOP Journal Archiveauthor services
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer
 
Bioinspiration and Biomimetics reasearch banner