journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physiological Measurement
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

Accurate measurement of extracellular fluid volume from the slope/intercept technique after bolus injection of a filtration marker

Nicholas J Bird et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 1371-1379   doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/12/006  Help

   PDF (267 KB) | References

Nicholas J Bird1, A Robert Michell2 and A Michael Peters1,3
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
2 Department of Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, St Bartholomew's Medical School, London, UK
3 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
E-mail: a.m.peters@bsms.ac.uk

Abstract. Extracellular fluid volume (ECV) is studied infrequently. The zero-time distribution volume (Vd) generated in the slope-intercept technique for measuring the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) substantially overestimates ECV. The aim was to validate a new technique for measuring ECV from the slope-intercept approach. GFR and ECV were measured using Cr-51-EDTA and iohexol injected into opposite arms in 51 patients undergoing routine measurement of GFR and on 48 occasions in 20 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were obtained bilaterally 20, 40, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min post-injection and assayed for indicator injected contralaterally. Reference ECV (ECV6) was calculated from all six samples as the product of indicator transit time and multi-sample GFR. GFR/ECV was calculated as the rate constant of the exponential fitted to the last three samples (GFR/ECV3). Slope-intercept GFR was calculated from the last three samples using the slope-intercept technique (GFR3). ECV (ECV3) was calculated by dividing GFR3 by GFR/ECV3, having corrected both for their one-compartment assumptions. ECV6EDTA correlated closely with ECV3EDTA (ECV3EDTA = 1.01.ECV6EDTA–0.5 L; r = 0.97; n = 99), but less closely with Vd (Vd = 1.17.ECV6EDTA + 0.7 L; r = 0.86). ECV6iohexol correlated slightly better with ECV6 EDTA (ECV6EDTA = 0.81.ECV6iohexol + 3.3 L; r = 0.86) than with ECV3EDTA (ECV3EDTA = 0.83.ECV6iohexol + 2.9 L; r = 0.84) and had slightly narrower 95% limits of agreement (−3.82 and 2.82 L versus −3.90 to 3.43 L). In conclusion, ECV can be measured from three samples almost as accurately as ECV from multiple samples.

Keywords: extracellular fluid volume, glomerular filtration rate, Cr-51-EDTA, iohexol

Print publication: Issue 12 (December 2009)
Received 22 July 2009, accepted for publication 25 September 2009
Published 28 October 2009

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

IOP Journal Archiveeprintweb.org - Your address for E prints
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer
 
Bioinspiration and Biomimetics reasearch banner