journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physiological Measurement
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

A measure of the information content of EIT data

Andy Adler et al 2008 Physiol. Meas. 29 S101-S109   doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S09  Help

   PDF (117 KB) | References | Articles citing this article

Andy Adler1, Richard Youmaran2 and William R B Lionheart3
1 Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
2 School of Information Technology and Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada
3 School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, UK
E-mail: adler@sce.carleton.ca

Abstract. We ask: how many bits of information (in the Shannon sense) do we get from a set of EIT measurements? Here, the term information in measurements (IM) is defined as: the decrease in uncertainty about the contents of a medium, due to a set of measurements. This decrease in uncertainty is quantified by the change from the inter-class model, q, defined by the prior information, to the intra-class model, p, given by the measured data (corrupted by noise). IM is measured by the expected relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence) between distributions q and p, and corresponds to the channel capacity in an analogous communications system. Based on a Gaussian model of the measurement noise, Σn, and a prior model of the image element covariances Σx, we calculate IM = \frac{1}{2} \sum {\rm log}_2 ([{\rm SNR}]_i + 1) , where [SNR]i is the signal-to-noise ratio for each independent measurement calculated from the prior and noise models. For an example, we consider saline tank measurements from a 16 electrode EIT system, with a 2 cm radius non-conductive target, and calculate IM =179 bits. Temporal sequences of frames are considered, and formulae for IM as a function of temporal image element correlations are derived. We suggest that this measure may allow novel insights into questions such as distinguishability limits, optimal measurement schemes and data fusion.

Keywords: measurement information, Kullback–Leibler divergence, electrical impedance tomography

Print publication: Issue 6 (June 2008)
Received 5 December 2007, accepted for publication 23 April 2008
Published 10 June 2008

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

This Month's Paperseprintweb.org - Your address for E prints
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2010.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer