journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

A comparison of finite element and atomistic modelling of fracture

V R Coffman et al 2008 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 16 065008 (15pp)   doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/16/6/065008  Help

   PDF (2.01 MB) | References

V R Coffman1,5, J P Sethna1, G Heber2, M Liu2, A Ingraffea2, N P Bailey3 and E I Barker4
1 Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics (LASSP), Clark Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2501, USA
2 Cornell Fracture Group, Rhodes Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2501, USA
3 Department of Mathematics and Physics (IMFUFA), DNRF Center 'Glass and Time', Roskilde University, PO Box 260, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
4 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
5 Present address: Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
E-mail: valerie.coffman@nist.gov

Abstract. Are the cohesive laws of interfaces sufficient for modelling fracture in polycrystals using the cohesive zone model? We examine this question by comparing a fully atomistic simulation of a silicon polycrystal with a finite element simulation with a similar overall geometry. The cohesive laws used in the finite element simulation are measured atomistically. We describe in detail how to convert the output of atomistic grain boundary fracture simulations into the piecewise linear form needed by a cohesive zone model. We discuss the effects of grain boundary microparameters (the choice of section of the interface, the translations of the grains relative to one another and the cutting plane of each lattice orientation) on the cohesive laws and polycrystal fracture. We find that the atomistic simulations fracture at lower levels of external stress, indicating that the initiation of fracture in the atomistic simulations is likely dominated by irregular atomic structures at external faces, internal edges, corners and junctions of grains. Thus, the cohesive properties of interfaces alone are not likely to be sufficient for modelling the fracture of polycrystals using continuum methods.

Print publication: Issue 6 (September 2008)
Received 6 March 2008, in final form 3 July 2008
Published 11 August 2008

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

This Month's PapersPW launch banner
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer
 
Bioinspiration and Biomimetics reasearch banner