|
|
|
|||
| Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | | ||||
2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 7799-7811 doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/37/31/011
![]()
|
||||
Abstract.
The evolution of both quantum and classical ensembles may be described via the probability density P on configuration space, its canonical conjugate S, and an ensemble Hamiltonian
. For quantum ensembles this evolution is, of course, equivalent to the Schrödinger equation for the wavefunction, which is linear. However, quite simple constraints on the canonical fields P and S correspond to nonlinear constraints on the wavefunction. Such constraints act to prevent certain superpositions of wavefunctions from being realized, leading to superselection-type rules. Examples leading to superselection for energy, spin direction and 'classicality' are given. The canonical formulation of the equations of motion, in terms of a probability density and its conjugate, provides a universal language for describing classical and quantum ensembles on both continuous and discrete configuration spaces, and is briefly reviewed in an appendix.
PACS number: 03.65.Ta
Print publication: Issue 31 (6 August 2004)| Post to CiteUlike | | Post to Connotea | | Post to Bibsonomy |
|
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | Recommend this journal EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft. Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2010. Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited. Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer |