|
|
|
|||
| Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | | ||||
2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 8113-8127 doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/36/29/316
![]()
|
||||
Abstract. We show how to convert a quantum stabilizer code to a one- or two-way entanglement distillation protocol. The proposed conversion method is a generalization of those of Shor–Preskill and Nielsen–Chuang. The recurrence protocol and the quantum privacy amplification protocol are equivalent to the protocols converted from [[2, 1]] stabilizer codes. We also give an example of a two-way protocol converted from a stabilizer better than the recurrence protocol and the quantum privacy amplification protocol. The distillable entanglement by the class of one-way protocols converted from stabilizer codes for a certain class of states is equal to or greater than the achievable rate of stabilizer codes over the channel corresponding to the distilled state, and they can distill asymptotically more entanglement from a very noisy Werner state than the hashing protocol.
PACS numbers: 03.67.Pp, 03.67.Mn, 03.67.Hk, 89.70.+c
Print publication: Issue 29 (25 July 2003)| Post to CiteUlike | | Post to Connotea | | Post to Bibsonomy |
|
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | Recommend this journal EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft. Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009. Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited. Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer |
|
| |