|
|
|
|||
| IOP Publishing | EPS | SIF | EDP Sciences | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | | ||||
2008 EPL 83 18002 (6pp) doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/83/18002
![]()
|
||||
Abstract. That almost all language networks are small-world and scale-free raises the question of whether syntax plays a role to measure the complexity of a language network. To answer this question, we built up two random language (dependency) networks based on a dependency syntactic network and investigated the complexity of these three language networks to see if the non-syntactic ones have network indicators similar to the syntactic one. The results show that all the three networks are small-world and scale-free. While syntax influences the indicators of a complex network, scale-free is only a necessary but not sufficient condition to judge whether a network is syntactic or non-syntactic. The network analysis focuses on the global organization of a language, it may not reflect the subtle syntactic differences of the sentence structure.
PACS numbers: 89.75.Hc, 89.90.+n
Print publication: Issue 1 (July 2008)| Post to CiteUlike | | Post to Connotea | | Post to Bibsonomy |
|
IOP Publishing | EPS | SIF | EDP Sciences | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | Recommend this journal EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft. Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009. Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited. Help: Cookies | Data Protection. |