journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

High-frequency corrections to the detector response and their effect on searches for gravitational waves

M Rakhmanov et al 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 184017 (13pp)   doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/25/18/184017  Help

   PDF (461 KB) | References | Articles citing this article

M Rakhmanov1, J D Romano1,2 and J T Whelan3
1 University of Texas at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX 78520, USA
2 Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, Wales, UK
3 Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut), D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
E-mail: malik@phys.utb.edu, joe@phys.utb.edu and john.whelan@aei.mpg.de

Abstract. Searches for gravitational waves with km-scale laser interferometers often involve the long-wavelength approximation to describe the detector response. The prevailing assumption is that the corrections to the detector response due to its finite size are small and the errors due to the long-wavelength approximation are negligible. Recently, however, Baskaran and Grishchuk (2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 4041) found that in a simple Michelson interferometer such errors can be as large as 10%. For more accurate analysis, these authors proposed to use a linear-frequency correction to the long-wavelength approximation. In this paper we revisit these calculations. We show that the linear-frequency correction is inadequate for certain locations in the sky and therefore accurate analysis requires taking into account the exact formula, commonly derived from the photon round-trip propagation time. Also, we extend the calculations to include the effect of Fabry–Perot resonators in the interferometer arms. Here we show that a simple approximation which combines the long-wavelength Michelson response with the single-pole approximation to the Fabry–Perot transfer function produces rather accurate results. In particular, the difference between the exact and the approximate formulae is at most 2–3% for those locations in the sky where the detector response is greater than half of its maximum value. We analyse the impact of such errors on detection sensitivity and parameter estimation in searches for periodic gravitational waves emitted by a known pulsar, and in searches for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background. At frequencies up to 1 kHz, the effect of such errors is at most 1–2%. For higher frequencies, or if more accuracy is required, one should use the exact formula for the detector response.

PACS numbers: 04.80.Nn, 95.55.Ym

Print publication: Issue 18 (21 September 2008)
Received 23 April 2008, in final form 3 July 2008
Published 2 September 2008

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

This Month's Paperseprintweb.org - Your address for E prints
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2010.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer