journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

Robust vetoes for gravitational-wave burst triggers using known instrumental couplings

P Ajith et al 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 5825-5837   doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/23/20/005  Help

   PDF (535 KB) | References | Articles citing this article

P Ajith1, M Hewitson1, J R Smith1 and K A Strain1,2
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) und Universität Hannover, Callinstr. 38, 30167 Hannover, Germany
2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
E-mail: Ajith.Parameswaran@aei.mpg.de

Abstract. The search for signatures of transient, unmodelled gravitational-wave (GW) bursts in the data of ground-based interferometric detectors typically uses 'excess-power' search methods. One of the most challenging problems in the burst data analysis is to distinguish between actual GW bursts and spurious noise transients that trigger the detection algorithms. In this paper, we present a unique and robust strategy to 'veto' the instrumental glitches. This method makes use of the phenomenological understanding of the coupling of different detector sub-systems to the main detector output. The main idea behind this method is that the noise at the detector output (channel H) can be projected into two orthogonal directions in the Fourier space—along, and orthogonal to, the direction in which the noise in an instrumental channel X would couple to H. If a noise transient in the detector output originates from channel X, it leaves the statistics of the noise component of H orthogonal to X unchanged, which can be verified by a statistical hypothesis testing. This strategy is demonstrated by doing software injections in simulated Gaussian noise. We also formulate a less rigorous, but computationally inexpensive alternative to the above method. Here, the parameters of the triggers in channel X are compared to the parameters of the triggers in channel H to see whether a trigger in channel H can be 'explained' by a trigger in channel X and the measured transfer function.

PACS numbers: 95.55.Ym, 04.80.Nn

Print publication: Issue 20 (21 October 2006)
Received 15 May 2006, in final form 11 July 2006
Published 20 September 2006

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

PhysicsWorld, subscribe noweprintweb.org - Your address for E prints
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2010.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer