|
|
|
|||
| Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | | ||||
2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 1465-1470 doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/19/7/331
![]()
|
||||
Abstract. Gravitational wave astronomy will require the coordinated analysis of data from the global network of gravitational wave observatories. Questions of how to optimally configure the global network arise in this context. We have elsewhere proposed a formalism which is employed here to compare different configurations of the network, using both the coincident network analysis method and the coherent network analysis method. We have constructed a network model to compute a figure-of-merit based on the detection rate for a population of standard-candle binary inspirals. We find that this measure of network quality is very sensitive to the geographic location of component detectors under a coincident network analysis, but comparatively insensitive under a coherent network analysis.
PACS numbers: 0480N, 0705K, 9555Y
Print publication: Issue 7 (7 April 2002)| Post to CiteUlike | | Post to Connotea | | Post to Bibsonomy |
|
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | Recommend this journal EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft. Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2010. Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited. Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer |