journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

NOTE

Technical note: comparing coherent and incoherent scatter effects for cone-beam CT

Yiannis Kyriakou et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 N175-N185   doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/10/N02  Help

   PDF (652 KB) | References | Articles citing this article

Yiannis Kyriakou, Michael Meyer and Willi A Kalender
Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
E-mail: yiannis.kyriakou@imp.uni-erlangen.de

Abstract. The intensity and distribution of scatter is of growing interest in the case of flat-detector CT (FD-CT) scanners. It is generally assumed that scatter is an offset distribution dominated by incoherent scatter (Compton effect). Coherent and incoherent scatter were computed with respect to acquisition parameters used in FD-CT. A hybrid method optimized the performance of the scatter simulation: a fast and exact analytical calculation of the single-scatter intensity combined with a coarse Monte Carlo (MC) estimate of multiple scatter to reduce overall computational expenses, while assuring an acceptable signal quality. The simulation package allowed for the separation of both coherent and incoherent single scatter. For cylindrical water phantoms varying from 40 mm to 320 mm diameter and for various z-collimations an investigation of the ratio of single-to-total scatter was performed. The intensity distribution of scatter (including coherent single scatter, incoherent single scatter and total scatter) was computed for phantoms of 160 mm and 320 mm diameter and energies varying from 40 keV to 120 keV. Additionally, voxel phantoms were generated from clinical head and thorax CT datasets and were employed in scatter simulations to demonstrate the effect of coherent and incoherent single scatter on the 2D projections. Single scatter determines a significant fraction of total scatter even for large body-sized phantoms and large field of measurement. Coherent scatter dominates the distribution of total scatter for most of the simulated cases, even for 120 keV. The Compton effect appeared to be less influential with respect to spatial distribution but dominated the overall magnitude.

Print publication: Issue 10 (21 May 2008)
Received 12 February 2008, in final form 18 March 2008
Published 25 April 2008

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 


Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection.