journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

A theoretical comparison of two optimization methods for radiofrequency drive schemes in high frequency MRI resonators

Feng Liu et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 5281-5291   doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/22/005  Help

   PDF (1.05 MB) | References | Articles citing this article

Feng Liu1, Barbara L Beck2, Jeffrey R Fitzsimmons2, Stephen J Blackband2,3 and Stuart Crozier1
1 The School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
2 McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
3 The National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL, USA
E-mail: stuart@itee.uq.edu.au

Abstract. In this paper, numerical simulations are used in an attempt to find optimal source profiles for high frequency radiofrequency (RF) volume coils. Biologically loaded, shielded/unshielded circular and elliptical birdcage coils operating at 170 MHz, 300 MHz and 470 MHz are modelled using the FDTD method for both 2D and 3D cases. Taking advantage of the fact that some aspects of the electromagnetic system are linear, two approaches have been proposed for the determination of the drives for individual elements in the RF resonator. The first method is an iterative optimization technique with a kernel for the evaluation of RF fields inside an imaging plane of a human head model using pre-characterized sensitivity profiles of the individual rungs of a resonator; the second method is a regularization-based technique. In the second approach, a sensitivity matrix is explicitly constructed and a regularization procedure is employed to solve the ill-posed problem. Test simulations show that both methods can improve the B1-field homogeneity in both focused and non-focused scenarios. While the regularization-based method is more efficient, the first optimization method is more flexible as it can take into account other issues such as controlling SAR or reshaping the resonator structures. It is hoped that these schemes and their extensions will be useful for the determination of multi-element RF drives in a variety of applications.

Print publication: Issue 22 (21 November 2005)
Received 4 August 2005, in final form 5 September 2005
Published 24 October 2005

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 


Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection.