journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

Hidden Markov modelling of spike propagation from interictal MEG data

A Ossadtchi et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 3447-3469   doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/14/017  Help

   PDF (515 KB) | References

A Ossadtchi1, J C Mosher2, W W Sutherling3, R E Greenblatt1 and R M Leahy4
1 Source Signal Imaging Inc., San Diego, CA 92103, USA
2 Biological & Quantum Physics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
3 Epilepsy and Brain Mapping Program, Huntington Memorial Hospital, Pasadena, CA 91105, USA
4 Signal and Image Processing Insitiute, USC, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
E-mail: leahy@sipi.usc.edu

Abstract. For patients with partial epilepsy, automatic spike detection techniques applied to interictal MEG data often discover several potentially epileptogenic brain regions. An important determination in treatment planning is which of these detected regions are most likely to be the primary sources of epileptogenic activity. Analysis of the patterns of propagation activity between the detected regions may allow for detection of these primary epileptic foci. We describe the use of hidden Markov models (HMM) for estimation of the propagation patterns between several spiking regions from interictal MEG data. Analysis of the estimated transition probability matrix allows us to make inferences regarding the propagation pattern of the abnormal activity and determine the most likely region of its origin. The proposed HMM paradigm allows for a simple incorporation of the spike detector specificity and sensitivity characteristics. We develop bounds on performance for the case of perfect detection. We also apply the technique to simulated data sets in order to study the robustness of the method to the non-ideal specificity–sensitivity characteristics of the event detectors and compare results with the lower bounds. Our study demonstrates robustness of the proposed technique to event detection errors. We conclude with an example of the application of this method to a single patient.

Print publication: Issue 14 (21 July 2005)
Received 17 February 2005, in final form 12 May 2005
Published 6 July 2005

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 


Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer