journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

Investigation of dose homogeneity for loose helical tomotherapy delivery in the context of breath-hold radiation therapy

Bryan Kim et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 2387-2404   doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/10/014  Help

   PDF (683 KB) | References | Articles citing this article

Bryan Kim1,2, Tomas Kron1,2,3, Jerry Battista1,2,3 and Jake Van Dyk1,2,3
1 London Regional Cancer Program, 790 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, Canada
2 Department of Medical Biophysics, Medical Science Building, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada
3 Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario and London Regional Cancer Program, 790 Commissioners Rd E, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
E-mail: bryan.kim@lrcc.on.ca

Abstract. Loose helical delivery is a potential solution to account for respiration-driven tumour motion in helical tomotherapy (HT). In this approach, a treatment is divided into a set of interlaced 'loose' helices commencing at different gantry angles. Each loose helix covers the entire target length in one gantry rotation during a single breath-hold. The dosimetric characteristics of loose helical delivery were investigated by delivering a 6 MV photon beam in a HT-like manner. Multiple scenarios of conventional 'tight' HT and loose helical deliveries were modelled in treatment planning software, and carried out experimentally with Kodak EDR2 film. The advantage of loose helical delivery lies in its ability to produce a more homogeneous dose distribution by eliminating the 'thread' effect—an inherent characteristic of HT, which results in dose modulations away from the axis of gantry rotation. However, loose helical delivery was also subjected to undesirable dose modulations in the direction of couch motion (termed 'beating' effect), when the ratio between the number of beam projections per gantry rotation (n) and pitch factor (p) was a non-integer. The magnitude of dose modulations decreased with an increasing n/p ratio. The results suggest that for the current HT unit (n = 51), dose modulations could be kept under 5% by selecting a pitch factor smaller than 7. A pitch factor of this magnitude should be able to treat a target up to 30 cm in length. Loose helical delivery should increase the total session time only by a factor of 2, while the planning time should stay the same since the total number of beam projections remains unchanged. Considering its dosimetric advantage and clinical practicality, loose helical delivery is a promising solution for the future HT treatments of respiration-driven targets.

Print publication: Issue 10 (21 May 2005)
Received 16 December 2004, in final form 25 February 2005
Published 5 May 2005

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 


Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection.