journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

NOTE

Optimal leaf sequencing with elimination of tongue-and-groove underdosage

Srijit Kamath et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 N7-N19   doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/3/N01  Help

   PDF (149 KB) | References | Articles citing this article

Srijit Kamath1, Sartaj Sahni1, Jatinder Palta2, Sanjay Ranka1 and Jonathan Li2
1 Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
E-mail: srkamath@cise.ufl.edu

Abstract. The individual leaves of a multileaf collimator (MLC) have a tongue-and-groove or stepped-edge design to minimize leakage radiation between adjacent leaves. This design element has a drawback in that it creates areas of underdosages in intensity-modulated photon beams unless a leaf trajectory is specifically designed such that for any two adjacent leaf pairs, the direct exposure under the tongue-and-groove is equal to the lower of the direct exposures of the leaf pairs. In this work, we present a systematic study of the optimization of a leaf sequencing algorithm for segmental multileaf collimator beam delivery that completely eliminates areas of underdosages due to tongue-and-groove or stepped-edge design of the MLC. Simultaneous elimination of tongue-and-groove effect and leaf interdigitation is also studied. This is an extension of our previous work (Kamath et al 2003a Phys. Med. Biol. 48 307) in which we described a leaf sequencing algorithm that is optimal for monitor unit (MU) efficiency under most common leaf movement constraints that include minimum leaf separation. Compared to our previously published algorithm (without constraints), the new algorithms increase the number of sub-fields by approximately 21% and 25%, respectively, but are optimal in MU efficiency for unidirectional schedules.

Print publication: Issue 3 (7 February 2004)
Received 8 July 2003
Published 16 January 2004

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 


Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer