journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging

Yongfeng Yang et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 2527-2545   doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/12/005  Help

   PDF (507 KB) | References | Articles citing this article

Yongfeng Yang1, Yuan-Chuan Tai2, Stefan Siegel3, Danny F Newport3, Bing Bai4, Quanzheng Li4, Richard M Leahy4 and Simon R Cherry1
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
2 Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, 510 S Kingshighway Boulevard, Box 8225, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
3 Concorde Microsystems Inc., 10427 Cogdill Road Suite 500, Knoxville, TN 37932, USA
4 Signal and Image Processing Institute, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA

Abstract. MicroPET II is a newly developed PET (positron emission tomography) scanner designed for high-resolution imaging of small animals. It consists of 17 640 LSO crystals each measuring 0.975 × 0.975 × 12.5 mm3, which are arranged in 42 contiguous rings, with 420 crystals per ring. The scanner has an axial field of view (FOV) of 4.9 cm and a transaxial FOV of 8.5 cm. The purpose of this study was to carefully evaluate the performance of the system and to optimize settings for in vivo mouse and rat imaging studies. The volumetric image resolution was found to depend strongly on the reconstruction algorithm employed and averaged 1.1 mm (1.4 µl) across the central 3 cm of the transaxial FOV when using a statistical reconstruction algorithm with accurate system modelling. The sensitivity, scatter fraction and noise-equivalent count (NEC) rate for mouse- and rat-sized phantoms were measured for different energy and timing windows. Mouse imaging was optimized with a wide open energy window (150–750 keV) and a 10 ns timing window, leading to a sensitivity of 3.3% at the centre of the FOV and a peak NEC rate of 235 000 cps for a total activity of 80 MBq (2.2 mCi) in the phantom. Rat imaging, due to the higher scatter fraction, and the activity that lies outside of the field of view, achieved a maximum NEC rate of 24 600 cps for a total activity of 80 MBq (2.2 mCi) in the phantom, with an energy window of 250–750 keV and a 6 ns timing window. The sensitivity at the centre of the FOV for these settings is 2.1%. This work demonstrates that different scanner settings are necessary to optimize the NEC count rate for different-sized animals and different injected doses. Finally, phantom and in vivo animal studies are presented to demonstrate the capabilities of microPET II for small-animal imaging studies.

Print publication: Issue 12 (21 June 2004)
Received 29 January 2004
Published 26 May 2004

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 


Find related articles






Article options

Authors & Referees

 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer