journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Metrologia
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

KEY COMPARISON

CCQM-K32 key comparison and P84 pilot study: Amount of silicon oxide as a thickness of SiO2 on Si

M P Seah 2008 Metrologia 45 08013   doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/08013  Help

   Articles citing this article

M P Seah
Quality of Life Division, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, UK

Abstract. CCQM-K32 and P84 were conducted following the pilot study P-38 to demonstrate and document the capability of interested National Metrology Institutes to measure the amount of silicon oxide on silicon wafers expressed as a thickness of SiO2 for nominal thicknesses in the range 1.5 nm to 8 nm. 'Amount of substance' may be expressed in many ways and here the measurand is the thickness of the silicon oxide layer on each of a total of 9 samples of nominal thicknesses in the range 1.5 to 8 nm on (100) and (111) Si substrates, expressed as the thickness of SiO2. This report presents the results from K32 and P84. It includes the data received for the measured values and their associated uncertainties, at 95% confidence, for the 9 samples prior to the deadline for receipt of data. The materials are grown by thermal oxidation in very clean furnaces designed for high quality gate oxides on Si wafers in European and US facilities at the same time as those for the pilot study, P-38. Separate samples were provided to each institute in special containers limiting the carbonaceous contamination to below about 0.3 nm. The 9 samples included 5 samples of ultra-thin SiO2 on (100) orientated wafers of Si and 4 samples of ultra-thin SiO2 on (111) orientated wafers of Si.

The measurements from the 11 participating laboratories were conducted using ellipsometry, neutron reflectivity (NR), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or x-ray reflectivity measurements (XRR), guided by the protocol developed in the pilot study P-38 and reproduced in the Appendix. The measurements are given in tables 2 and 3. A very small correction is then made for the different samples that each laboratory received as in table 4. Where appropriate, method offset values deduced from the pilot study P-38 are given in table 5 leading to comparative data in tables 6 and 7. Values for the key comparison reference values (KCRVs) and their associated uncertainties are made from the weighted means and the expanded weighted standard deviations of the means from table 6. This is provided in table 8. Graphical plots of equivalence from tables 6 and 8 are provided in figure 1 and equivalence statements are presented in Annex A. Additional XPS and XRR data from NMIJ for K32 were withdrawn from the KCRV evaluation and are given in Annex B.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

BEC Matters!PW launch banner
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer