journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Metrologia
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

KEY COMPARISON

Final report on key comparison APMP.QM-K4.1: Ethanol in nitrogen

Kenji Kato et al 2008 Metrologia 45 08007   doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/08007  Help


Kenji Kato1, Masaaki Maruyama2, Jin Seog Kim3, Oh Sang Hyub3, Jin-Chun Woo3, Yongdoo Kim3, Hyunkil Bae3, Qiao Han4 and Zeyi Zhou4
1 National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), Tsukuba Central 3, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8563, Japan
2 Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Japan (CERI) Tokyo Laboratory, Chemical Standard Department, 1600, Shimo-Takano, Sugito-machi, Kitakatsushika-gun, Saitama 345-0043, Japan
3 Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Division of Chemical Metrology & Materials Evaluation, 1 Doryong Dong, Yuseong Gu, Daejon, 305-340, Korea
4 National Research Center for Certified Reference Materials, Beijing Beisanhuan Donglu No. 18, Beijing 100013, China

Abstract. The aim of this comparison was to compare capabilities for the preparation and value assignment of gas mixture standards for ethanol in nitrogen, maintained at national metrology institutes (NMIs). The measurements in this key comparison took place in 2006. There were three participants and one coordinating laboratory. The key comparison reference value (KCRV) was based on the gravimetric preparation for all components. The range of the nominal amount-of-substance fractions of the comparison standard is 100 µmol/mol to 130 µmol/mol. The Chemical Evaluation Research Institute (CERI, Japan) prepared gravimetric mixture samples of ethanol in nitrogen in 10 L aluminium cylinders and the homogeneity and long-term stability of these samples were evaluated at CERI before and after the shipment of the cylinders to the participants. Each participating laboratory was shipped one cylinder to be analyzed and then returned to the CERI. Each sample was reanalyzed to verify whether the contents were stable throughout the comparison. These measurements showed no significant change in the amount fraction within the estimated uncertainty of the measurements. Two of the three participants submitted results that were within 0.1% of the relevant reference value. In these cases, the estimated uncertainty was larger than the deviation from the reference value. CERI was the link laboratory between CCQM-K4 and APMP.QM-K4.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

BEC Matters!Optics.org banner
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection.