journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Metrologia
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

PILOT STUDY

A preparative comparison using the 'harmonization' method on standards of synthetic natural gas (CCQM-P87)

G Vargha et al 2008 Metrologia 45 08004   doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/08004  Help


G Vargha1, M J T Milton1, Hans-Joachim Heine2, Belen Martin3, Alejandro Pérez Castorena4, Victor Serrano Caballero4, Francisco Rangel Murillo4, Manuel Avila Salas4, Carlos Ramírez Nambo4, Melina Pérez Urquiza4, Carlos Carbajal Alarcón4, Jin Chun Woo5, Tatiana Mace6, Adriaan van der Veen7, Rob Wessel7, Paul Ziel7, Damian Smeulders8, Nobuhiro Matsumoto9, Leonid Konopelko10 and Yury Kustikov10
1 NPL (National Physical Laboratory), Middlesex, UK
2 BAM (Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung), Germany
3 CEM (Centro Español de Metrología), Madrid, Spain
4 CENAM (Centro Nacional de Metrologia), Mexico
5 KRISS (Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science), Korea
6 LNE (Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais), Paris, France
7 NMi Van Swinden Laboratorium BV, The Netherlands
8 NMIA (National Measurement Institute of Australia), Lindfield, NSW 2070, Australia
9 NMIJ (National Metrology Institute of Japan), Ibaraki, Japan
10 VNIIM (D I Mendeleev Institute for Metrology), St Petersburg, Russia

Abstract. Twenty-two standards of synthetic natural gas standards were submitted from ten different NMIs for a comparison using the harmonization method developed by NPL. All standards had seven components. This method can remove the correlated variation in calibration data for multi-component mixtures and makes a significant improvement in fitting individual points to calibration curves. After removing the non-random variation from the data all the standards showed very good agreement with only a few outliers. The typical deviation from the calibration curves was around 0.05% (relative) for the main components and less than 0.2% for the butanes.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM GAWG.

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

This Month's PapersPW launch banner
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer