journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Metrologia
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

KEY COMPARISON

Final report on key comparison COOMET.M.P-K1 in the range 0.05 MPa to 0.5 MPa of pneumatic gauge pressure

Yu Kiselev et al 2008 Metrologia 45 07015   doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/07015  Help


Yu Kiselev1, W Sabuga2, K Dapkeviciene3, P Farar4, K Saczuk5 and I Sandu6
1 D I Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology (VNIIM), Russia
2 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Germany
3 Vilnius Metrology Center (VMC), Lithuania
4 Slovak Institute of Metrology (SMU), Slovakia
5 Byelorussian State Institute of Metrology (BelGIM), Byelorussia
6 National Institute of Metrology (INM), Romania

Abstract. This report describes a COOMET key comparison of pneumatic pressure standards of six national metrology institutes (NMIs) that was carried out in the period from September 2004 to June 2006 in order to determine their degrees of equivalence in the range 50 kPa to 500 kPa of the gauge pressure. The pilot laboratory was VNIIM. The pressure standards of the participating NMIs were pressure balances of different design. The transfer standard was a 5 cm2 piston–cylinder assembly accompanied by a mounting post and a weight carrier supplied by VNIIM. The pressure-dependent effective areas of the transfer standard at specified pressures were reported by the participants. The reference values were calculated as the weighted means of the results of VNIIM and PTB, which were primary and independent laboratories in this comparison. The results of this comparison were linked to the 1 MPa comparison CCM.P-K1.b using the results of the PTB obtained in both comparisons. Results by all but one participant agree with the reference values and with each other within the expanded uncertainties calculated with a coverage factor 2; roughly a half of the reported results demonstrate agreement within their standard uncertainties. With the exception of one laboratory, the results of the comparison demonstrate the equivalence of the laboratory standards and support their measurement capability statements. For laboratories whose CMCs are not presented in the KCDB yet, this comparison provides a basis for submissions for the range 50 kPa to 500 kPa of pneumatic gauge pressure.

Main text. To reach the main text of this Paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

This Month's PapersPW launch banner
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer