journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Metrologia
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON

NANO5—2D Grating—Final report

Joergen Garnaes et al 2008 Metrologia 45 04003   doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/04003  Help

   Articles citing this article

Joergen Garnaes and Kai Dirscherl
Danish Fundamental Metrology Ltd, Matematiktorvet 307, DK-2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark

Abstract. This report is prepared for the Discussion Group 7 (DG7) for Nanometrology under the Consultative Committee for Length's Working Group on Dimensional Metrology (CCL-WGDM). It describes the comparison of calibration results of the pitch in the x and y directions and the angle of two two-dimensional gratings. The nominal values of the pitches are 300 nm and 1000 nm and the nominal angle is 90°. The standards were circulated between 12 national metrological institutes. The measurement methods were optical diffraction (OD) and scanning probe microscopy (SPM). The reported uncertainty for the pitch was in the range from 0.0031 nm (OD) to 3.1 nm and for the angle in the range from 0.0012° (OD) to 1.2°. Out of the 112 measurement results for the six measurands, 17 results have either been removed from the calculation of the reference value—due to errors acknowledged by the lab—or have been omitted as the En values were larger than one. Ten of the results have En values larger than one; six results have En values larger than two. However, the participating labs have identified errors and submitted a total of 15 corrected measurement values to be considered for inclusion in the calculation of the reference value. In the end only four results remain with an unexplained En value larger than one, ranging between 1.4 and 2.1. Acknowledging the errors found by the labs in this comparison, the measurement of pitch and angle are generally consistent and reliable to a very high accuracy.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

BEC Matters!eprintweb.org - Your address for E prints
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection.