journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Metrologia
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

PILOT STUDY

Final report on CCQM-P48: Uranium isotope ratio measurements in simulated biological/environmental materials

C R Quétel et al 2007 Metrologia 44 08010   doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/44/1A/08010  Help

   Articles citing this article

C R Quétel, N Lévêque, W De Bolle and E Ponzevera
European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Retieseweg 111, B-2440 Geel, Belgium
E-mail: Christophe.Quetel@ec.europa.eu

Abstract. CCQM-P48 was a Pilot Study of the Inorganic Analysis Working Group of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) and was organized by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) of the European Commission. It was the first CCQM comparison dedicated to isotope ratio measurements.

It involved a rather rare combination of 5 national metrology institutes (NMIs), representing at the Comité International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM) 3 Member States of the Metre Convention and 2 international organisations, and 10 invited laboratories (5 'nuclear experts', 5 'geochemistry/mass spectrometry experts') selected outside CIPM. The aim was to compare capabilities to measure the n(234U)/n(238U), n(235U)/n(238U) and n(236U)/n(238U) ratios in 4 simulated biological/environmental materials prepared at a nominal uranium mass fraction of 5 µg g-1 (series A) and, optionally, in 4 simulated biological/environmental materials prepared at a nominal uranium mass fraction of 5 ng g-1 (series B). In addition, a diluted solution of IRMM-184, a natural uranium isotopic certified reference material (ICRM), had also been distributed for rehearsal as well as for calibration purposes. Participants, however, were free to apply the measurement strategy of their choice.

The test material can be assimilated to a biological/environmental type of sample as the matrix simulated approximately the composition of urine, from the combination in ~ 3% HNO3 solution of purified inorganic salt (aquarium seawater salts to 18 ± 2 g kg-1) and urea (to 17 ± 2 g kg-1). Four uranium isotopic mixtures were produced by mixing uranium ICRMs in the gas phase as UF6. Fractions of these mixtures, following their transformation under the form of solid UO3, were dissolved individually into ~ 3% HNO3 to get separate ~ 1000 mg uranium kg-1 mother solutions. Both series of test materials derived from these solutions (simple dilution into batches of simulated urine), but participants were not informed about this similitude.

The absolute value of the n(235U)/n(238U) ratio in each isotopic mixture was established at the earliest stage (i.e. in the gas phase) by calibrated gas source mass spectrometry measurements, and thus could serve as independent reference value (expanded, k = 2, uncertainty U = 0.05%, relative) for results from series A. 'Mixture mode' (MM) median data based on participants' results were proposed as consensus reference values for all the other sets of results produced.

For samples from series A, 6 laboratories implemented a combination of sample digestion and matrix separation steps, whereas 3 laboratories did not report any particular sample treatment (apart possibly from dilution). Only mass spectrometry was employed for isotope ratio measurements, including 9 MC-ICPMS, 3 HR-ICPMS, 2 TIMS and 1 ICP-QMS. For n(235U)/n(238U) ratios, results from 11 laboratories were in agreement within stated U with reference values for at least 3 mixtures; stated relative U were always > 0.0120% (except for 1 participant) and always ≤ 0.7% (except for 1 participant with U > 1% for 3 samples). Results on n(234U)/n(238U) ratios were almost always within ± 3% around the calculated MM median value. For the n(236U)/n(238U) smallest ratio, ~ 5 × 10-7, results relative to the calculated MM median value were within ± 20% for 8 participants, between 20% and 50% above for 3 other participants, over 50% above for 1 participant, and 3 participants did not report results. The perception of which factor caused the largest contribution to these uncertainty estimations differed among participants because of differences in the analytical methodologies deployed but mostly because of wide differences in concepts of uncertainty estimation.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM IAWG.

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

This Month's Papersauthor services
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer