journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Metrologia
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

KEY COMPARISON

International Key Comparison CCQM-K26.b and Pilot Study CCQM-P50.b: Comparison of primary standards of sulphur dioxide (SO2) in synthetic air

Masaaki Maruyama et al 2007 Metrologia 44 08007   doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/44/1A/08007  Help


Masaaki Maruyama1, Jiri Novak2, Jari Walden3, Kaisa Lusa3, Florbela Dias4, Annette Borowiak5, Friedrich Lagler5, Jln Seog Kim6, Tatiana Mace7, Christophe Sutuur7, Franklin Guenther8, Adriaan van der Veen9, Gerard Nieuwenkamp9, Janneke van Wijk9, Martin Milton10, Graham Leggett10, Anneliese Medem11, Volker Stummer11, Leonid Konopelko12, Yuri Kustikov12, Olga Efremova12 and Marina Froehlich13
1 CERI/NMIJ, Japan
2 CHMI, Czech Republic
3 FMI, Finland
4 IPQ, Portugal
5 DG-JRC IES, EU
6 KRISS, Korea
7 LNE, France
8 NIST, United States of America
9 NMi, The Netherlands
10 NPL, United Kingdom
11 UBA(D), Germany
12 VNIIM, Russia
13 UBA(A), Austria (Participant in CCQM-P50.b only)

Abstract. Accurate measurements of sulphur dioxide at the concentrations found in ambient air have become essential to support monitoring and legislation concerned with air quality. In general, the primary element of quality assurance for field instruments is regular calibration using certified gas mixtures. The concentration range chosen for this Key Comparison (240 nmol/mol to 320 nmol/mol) is defined by appropriate European standards and is typical of similar levels used around the world.

The travelling standards used for the comparison were prepared commercially by a supplier with a proven track record of preparing stable mixtures of the relevant gases. The coordinating laboratory (NPL) carried out stability checks on the mixtures and determined the amount fraction using a primary gravimetric permeation facility. These data were used to determine the drift rate (and uncertainty) of each standard.

The results for the 11 participants in CCQM-K26.b and the one participant in CCQM-P50.b are presented in this report. Degrees of equivalence have been calculated based on a reference value (corresponding to the KCRV) derived from the primary gravimetric facility used by the coordinating laboratory.

Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.

The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

IOP Journal ArchivePW launch banner
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer