journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Metrologia
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON

International comparison of He-Ne lasers stabilized with 127I2 at λ = 633 nm: Comparison of the fifth- and third-harmonic locking techniques

A Lassila et al 2000 Metrologia 37 701-707   doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/37/6/8  Help

   PDF (92.5 KB) | Gzipped PS (120 KB) | References

A Lassila, K Riski, J Hu, T Ahola, S Naicheng, L Chengyang, P Balling, J Blabla, L Abramova, Yu G Zakharenko, V L Fedorin, A Chartier and J-M Chartier
MIKES, HUT, NIM, CMI, VNIIM, BIPM

Abstract. An international comparison of 127I2-stabilized 633 nm He-Ne lasers locked either by the fifth- or the third-harmonic technique was carried out at the Finnish Centre for Metrology and Accreditation (MIKES) in September 1998. The participating laboratories were the MIKES; the Metrology Research Institute, Helsinki University of Technology (HUT); the Chinese National Institute of Metrology (NIM); the Czech Metrological Institute (CMI); the D. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology (VNIIM); and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). Raw measured frequency differences between lasers were in the following ranges: −5.2 kHz to +11.9 kHz and −5.8 kHz to +4.9 kHz for the third- and fifth-harmonic locking techniques, respectively. The frequency offsets between the third- and fifth-harmonic techniques for different components (d to g) were in the range 26 kHz to 35 kHz. The relative frequency stability of lasers given by the Allan standard deviations reached 2.6 × 10−13 for two lasers using the third harmonic and only 1 × 10−12 for the same lasers using the fifth harmonic for a 2000 s sampling time. This comparison is part of the ongoing laser comparison carried out under the auspices of the Consultative Committee for Length (CCL, formerly CCDM) of the Comité International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM); it is also a EUROMET project (No. 462).

Print publication: Issue 6 (December 2000)

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

PhysicsWorld, subscribe nowPW launch banner
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat and Gzip compressed PostScript.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer