journals.iop.org home page electronic journals * User guide   * Site map   | Quick Search:Help  
Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
Journals Home | Journals List | EJs Extra | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

Dendritic solidification morphology viewed from the perspective of constructal theory

A I Ciobanas et al 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 5252-5266   doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/39/24/023  Help

   PDF (668 KB) | References | Articles citing this article

A I Ciobanas1, A Bejan2 and Y Fautrelle1
1 EPM/CNRS Laboratory, ENSHMG, BP 95, 38402 Saint Martin d'Hères cedex, France
2 Duke University, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Durham, NC 27708-0300, USA
E-mail: aciobanas@yahoo.com

Abstract. In this paper we focus on the application of the constructal theory in predicting the dendritic solid structure. First we analyse the marginal stability criterion from the perspective of the constructal principle. Having as a guiding principle the constructal law we have shown that among the whole range of possible dendrite tip radiuses predicted by the stability analysis the dendrite tip will choose the smallest one, that is a radius equal with the smallest perturbation wavelength leading to instabilities. We identify as well the existence of a competition between the diffusion controlled growth and the dendritic growth. Second, we develop a model for the secondary arm spacing. We identify a competition between the lateral diffusion controlled growth of a needle and the dendritic growth of lateral secondary arms. By analysing this competition we are able to characterize the sidebranching mechanism and to finally compute the secondary arm spacing. The result is in good agreement with the experimental results. Finally, the primary arm spacing is analysed from the perspective of the constructal law. The constructal law predicts that the only way the columnar tips can optimize the solidification process is to minimize the spacing between two adjacent tips, namely λ1. By quantifying the two mechanisms responsible for the selection of λ1, the dendrite division and the dendrite overgrown mechanisms, we were finally able to obtain a model for the primary arm spacing. This model is also validated against various experimental data.

Print publication: Issue 24 (21 December 2006)
Received 16 July 2006, in final form 23 October 2006
Published 1 December 2006

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

IOP Journal Archiveauthor services
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the Terms and Conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection. Privacy policy Disclaimer
 
Bioinspiration and Biomimetics reasearch banner