American Astronomical Society Quick Search:Help  
The Astrophysical Journal
Athens/Institutional login
IOP login: Password:   
Create account | Alerts | Contact us
IOP Publishing | AAS Homepage | ApJ Homepage | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help |

Jet Breaks and Missing Breaks in the X-Ray Afterglow of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Shlomo Dado et al 2008 ApJ 680 517-530   doi: 10.1086/587869  Help

   PDF (1.25 MB) | HTML with Enhancements | References | Articles citing this article

Shlomo Dado1, Arnon Dar2 and A. De Rújula3
1 Physics Department and Space Research Institute, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
2 Physics Department and Space Research Institute, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel; and Theory Unit, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
3 Theory Unit, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland; and Physics Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215
E-mail: dado@phep3.technion.ac.il, arnon@physics.technion.ac.il, arnon.dar@cern.ch and alvaro.derujula@cern.ch

ABSTRACT. The X-ray afterglows (AGs) of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and X-ray flashes (XRFs) have, after the fast-decline phase of their prompt emission, a temporal behavior varying between two extremes. A large fraction of these AGs has a canonical light curve which, after an initial shallow-decay plateau phase, breaks smoothly into a fast power-law decline. Very energetic GRBs, contrariwise, appear to not have a break: their AGs decline like a power law from the start of the observations. Breaks and "missing breaks" are intimately related to the geometry and deceleration of the jets responsible for GRBs. In the frame of the cannonball (CB) model of GRBs and XRFs, we analyze the cited extreme behaviors (canonical and pure power law) and intermediate cases spanning the observed range of X-ray AG shapes. We show that the entire panoply of X-ray light-curve shapes—measured with Swift and other satellites—are as anticipated in the CB model. We test the expected correlations between the AG's shape and the peak and isotropic energies of the prompt radiation, strengthening a simple conclusion of the analysis of AG shapes: in energetic GRBs the break is not truly missing, it is hidden under the tail of the prompt emission, or it occurs too early to be recorded. We also verify that the spectral index of the unabsorbed AGs and the temporal indexes of their late power-law decline differ by half a unit, as predicted.

Subject headings: gamma rays: bursts; gamma rays: theory

Print publication: Issue 1 (2008 June 10)
Received 2007 December 13, accepted for publication 2008 February 6

Bookmark and Share Post to CiteUlike | Post to Connotea | Post to Bibsonomy

 

Find related articles





Article options

Authors & Referees

Nanotechnology news and resourceseprintweb.org - Your address for E prints
 
Content finder
  Full Search
  Help


  
Setup information is available for Adobe Acrobat.
EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft.
Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009 - electronic design and all rights in the EJs software.
© The American Astronomical Society ("AAS") - the names of any journals published by AAS and the content of all such journals.
Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited.
Help: Cookies | Data Protection.