|
|
|
|||
| IOP Publishing | AAS Homepage | ApJ Homepage | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | | ||||
2001 ApJ 557 891-896 doi: 10.1086/321678
![]()
|
||||
ABSTRACT. It has recently been argued that the distribution of waiting times between successive solar flares is incompatible with the prediction of lattice models, which interpret flares as avalanches of magnetic reconnection events within a stressed magnetic structure driven to a state of self-organized criticality by stochastic motions of the photospheric magnetic footpoints. Inspired by a suggestion recently made by Wheatland, we construct modified lattice models driven by a nonstationary random process. The resulting models have frequency distributions of waiting times that include a power-law tail at long waiting times, in agreement with observations. One model, based on a random walk modulation of an otherwise stationary driver, yields an exponent for the power-law tail equal to 2.51 ± 0.16, in reasonable agreement with observational inferences. This power-law tail survives in the presence of noise and a detection threshold. These findings lend further support to the avalanche model for solar flares.
Subject headings: MHD; Sun: flares; Sun: magnetic fields
Print publication: Issue 2 (2001 August 20)| Post to CiteUlike | | Post to Connotea | | Post to Bibsonomy |
|
IOP Publishing | AAS Homepage | ApJ Homepage | This Journal | Search | Authors | Referees | Librarians | User Options | Help | Recommend this journal EndNote, ProCite ® and Reference Manager ® are registered trademarks of ISI Researchsoft. Copyright © Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited 2009 - electronic design and all rights in the EJs software. © The American Astronomical Society ("AAS") - the names of any journals published by AAS and the content of all such journals. Use of this service is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of use. In particular, reselling and systematic downloading of files is prohibited. Help: Cookies | Data Protection. |